So we are now approaching nearly a decade of file sharing and torrent downloading. The culture and networks supporting this are established and active enough to testify its longevity. If there were any doubts on the power and infrastructure of the downloading community the backlash and negative publicity over SOPA and PIPA put that to rest… simply stated file sharing, or for the opposition, piracy is here to stay. But, in relations to music on a macro view, is this intellectual property and copyright infringement a positive reality or destructive to the music industry we all love so dear. My hope in this entry is to bring enlightenment to the many contemporary ideas concerning copyright infringement and how, whether you like or not, it contains positive qualities.
First off when we as music
listeners, or a consumer of anything for that matter, perceives and listens to
a given song we have expectations or uses in which we hope to gratify. We want to receive a benefit from anything
like an emotional stimulation, social acceptance, or self expression. A lot of times these expectations are
inherent and satisfied on a sub-conscious level but nonetheless are
present. The minute a monetary exchange
takes place, i.e. purchase of a song/album, there is an immediate spike in the
music consumers’ expectations. The money
invested psychologically shifts the individual to demand more gratification in
order to meet their now raised expectations.
This can ultimately influence the listeners end perception of whether or
not you like the artist and if there will be a continuous relationship. I mean think about the last time you
purchased an album (if you can even remember) in which it was sub-par, guaranteed
you either forgot about the artist in its entirety or no longer listen to them. The next time you probably encountered that
artists’ you had a very powerful negative stigma going in, which is known as selective
process. This experience brings to light
the reality that music listeners are more likely to enjoy, partake, and
continue listening to an artist’s when their expectations are lowered. This happens when they can consume music for
free through the usage of file sharing.
The amount of new music and independent
artists that have been able to find success in this realm is very encouraging,
especially since most artists are accepting to the communal experience of file
sharing more than ever. To me, the
landmark example and one that proved all the positive attributes of file
sharing to ring true was the historic release of Radiohead’s In Rainbows. Already established worldwide in the “indie/alternative”
scene, the band decided to release their 7th album completely free
via download on their website. Not to
mention also that they did not re-sign to a major label at this period,
becoming completely self-distributed.
The album propelled them into a whole new level exposure and critical
acclaim. I will venture to argue that so
many people connected strongly to this album because they were able to listen
to it with a lowered expectation and sense of gratification due to the absence
of monetary exchange. Ultimately file
sharing provides the artists with a much more quality exposure.
Here
are the guys from Radiohead on The Colbert Report talking and joking about
various issues including self-distribution…http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/397946/september-26-2011/radiohead
I think you have a great and very relevant topic at hand. I can definitely see it is something that you have an interest in. With the advancement of the internet and technology, as a whole, it is becoming much easier to discover new artists and really relate to their music. Releasing free downloads is a public relations plus for any musician. Plus, you're right, I can't remember the last time a purchased an album.
ReplyDelete